When you are in a professional conversation, leading with a disclaimer about what you are going to say sabotages your effectiveness.

I know this may sound silly but...

Never lead your comments with a disclaimer,  doing so gives those folks with little minds and too much authority the ability to dismiss your ideas out of hand- without even considering them. If I might suggest, perhaps you could develop a “reality test” for presenting your ideas that will assure that they are relevant, reachable, and the  right means to solve the issue at hand.

Relevant- is the idea even applicable to the subject at hand? If not- no matter how witty, brilliant or insightful- it is probably better to keep it to yourself until a more appropriate opportunity to discuss it comes along.

Reachable– is the idea even  remotely reachable with the resources available? Out of the box thinking is one thing, but if your idea can’t possibly be reached because the resources aren’t even possible, that might be considered by some to be evidence that you are out of your mind.

Right Means– Sometimes novel ideas are called for,  but some sense of appropriateness is called for if you are in a professional meeting. Unless they have formally issued “Executive Clemency” for what might be said or are flying the brainstorming – “every idea is a good idea flag”- a good test is whether  or not the means to do what you are suggesting is appropriate. Yes, you can use a handgun as a hammer to punch that loose tack further in to the bulletin board. Is it the right means for your culture? Is it appropriate?

Is your idea Relevant? Reachable? The Right Means?

If so, bring it on, no disclaimers or self deprecation please.

Do you have a story about slamming the door on what turned out to be a great idea because you were defensive or apologetic in your presentation?

Joe Isuzu

Proof the system can work if the Administration has the will.

A welcome victory for Washington.

The WTO Appellate Body on Monday ruled in Geneva that safeguard tariffs imposed by President Obama on China two years ago were legal under WTO rules.

We have followed this case since January 2010 Chinese Tire Appeal.

We advised the follow up:  WTO rules against China

Here is the link to  the WTO page on the dispute, where you can  choose various downloads of their findings WTO CHINA TYRES

While there are many ways that this “win” will be presented to us as “news”- the fact that we think will be ignored by all is that it is the continued “do nothing about the Chinese currency undervaluation” that  is keeping us disadvantaged economically.

This WTO victory shows us that when the administration has the will to pursue relief from unfair trading practices, the system can result in such relief being recognized as lawful.

So while some pundits will characterize this current WTO decision as a “Victory for Obama,” Victory for America,” or Victory for Unions”- the fact is that the real damage to America’s economy is the ongoing,  continued predation caused by the Chinese currency peg to the US Dollar. China devalues the yuan by 40%, making Chinese goods artifically inexpensive, stealing US manufacturing jobs.

We congratulate the Obama Administration for their work on the dumping of cheap Chinese tires. How about getting to work on the dumping of manufactured goods through the use of the undervalued yuan?

Facts for Fairness:  Neither the current  (Obama) nor prior  (Bush) administrations have done anything about the Chinese currency manipulation and its mercantilist consequences except talk. And for the record, the Chinese joined the WTO under the auspices and consent of the Clinton administration.

WTO Summary and findings

PDF Just the conclusions

Photocredit.

It’s never good to be unemployed, but the irony of being unemployed on Labor Day is particularly frustrating.

Happy Labor Day???

What frustrates me,  and many of the small business owners in the precision machining industry that I know, is that there are job openings for people with skills.

Listen for the following from a shop owner in the video link below:

“It is so difficult to find  skilled toolmakers and machinists, whether we had an opening or not, we would take them.”

Businesses Struggle To Find Employees

If you have math and problem solving skills, can gain understanding by  doing, watching and thinking, and want to have the satisfaction of making things that make a difference on people’s lives- like anti lock brake parts, or medical device components, or critical pieces for “Anything that goes”- I respectfully suggest that you check out the precision machining program at your local community college.

We need skilled people to operate todays advanced manufacturing equipment-get trained!

If you do I  sincerely believe that you will be celebrating Labor Day differently next year.

To find a  Machinist Training Program near you  just type in the phrase ” Precision Machining Community Colleges”  or “Machinist Training”  and the state you live in to get started on your way to celebrating Labor Day next year.

Disclaimer: I have personal experience with a certificate program  from Lorain County Community College– I know this pathway works because it worked for me! (I was in Quality Control Program.)

More info  here and here

Unemployed photo credit

This is why yield strength doesn’t correlate well to hardness…

These samples sure yielded...

Cold drawing of steel bars changes the mechanical properties of the hot roll bar feedstock. With standard draft:

  • Tensile strength increases by 25-30%;
  • Yield strength increases 60 to 80%;
  • Brinell Hardness  increases about 15%;
  • Ductility DECREASES 25-30% typically with standard draft.

As can be seen by the yield strength increase  compared to hardness increase by cold drawing, the yield strength picks up about  a 4 times multiple compared to hardness. Poor correlation.

Hardness correlates well with tensile strength in most steels.

In fact, my rule of thumb for estimating either  tensile strength or hardness is that

Tensile Strength divided by 500= Brinell Hardness

 for most low and medium carbon steels. Or

Brinell Hardness multiplied by 500= Tensile Strength.

Try it with your data.

Photocredit