Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Summary: A change in the interpretation of  the word ‘FEASIBLE’ by OSHA could cause all shop owners whose shops noise level exceeds 85 dB to be REQUIRED by OSHA under this new definition to install expensive engineering or administrative controls to abate the noise  to levels below the action level. PPE could no longer be acceptable as the sole means of addressing noise exposure in our shops.
Action You Need to Take:
1)      Determine the noise level in your shop to see if it exceeds 85dB TWA.
2)      Determine cost to install noise guarding on machines necessary to abate noise levels to below 85dB (engineering control)
3)      Determine how many machines must be taken out of service at a time to prevent the noise level from exceeding the 85dB level ( administrative control )
4)      Perform a business case analysis to see if your company can remain in business if this change to the definition becomes law, requiring you to purchase sound dampening or reduce production.
5)      Document the cost to comply, loss of jobs, and any reduction in competitiveness, capacity or other issue that is a result.
6)      Send to Miles Free  gro.apmp@eerfm so that I can include in PMPA’s formal comments.
7)      Send a letter to the Docket for comments on this proposed change in interpretation as well as one to your congressman and please copy PMPA.
Submit comments at Individuals who mail or deliver comments must submit three copies to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2010-0032, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. Submissions not longer than 10 pages may be faxed to 202-693-1648 
Don’t delay.
PMPA and other metalworking associations requested, and received an extension on the Comments deadline so that we could obtain facts needed to properly assess the consequences of this new interpretation. Comments are now due by March 21, 2011. We need your facts to make our case!
 We need your data now to effectively represent you on this potentially shop closing issue.
 All data that we have seen from Member shops so far has shown that these shops will need to add sound dampening equipment.
Links: Extension letter:
Notice of Proposed Reinterpretation:
PMPA Extension Request Letter:
The shop (and machininst jobs) you save may be your own.

4 thoughts on “OSHA, Noise, And Your Precision Machining Shop

  1. Tristan Adkins says:

    I Work at a shop that noise levels are close if not higher to 85 dB. It is work policy that we wear PPE at all times. So why would we need to spend money we don’t have to make it a little more quiet. Please explain this to me further.

  2. speakingofprecision says:

    There was a supreme court decision that says that feasible means feasible, not the agency’s definition of feasible. So with this new proposal, if the OSHA inspector says its feasible, it is. Except that it may not be in the business’s capability to fund, or to stay in business. That’s why we are trying to ensure shops know that this is looming ahead of them. Please read the federal register link in my post to get the blow by blow details. If your shop can send me data, I will aggregate it while keeping shop identity confidential in order to comment on the effects and affected by the proposed change. Thanks for the follow up!

  3. OSHA says:

    My spouse and I stumbled over here coming from a djfferent wweb page
    and thought I should check things out. I likoe what I
    see soo noww i am following you. Look forward to looking
    into your web page for a secnd time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>