The commissioners found the US domestic industry had been injured, with all six commissioners voting that injury had occurred as a result of the flood of imports of chinese subsidized steel tubes.
The US International Trade Commission (ITC)  announced today its final determination in favor of the domestic steel industry over the Chinese industry in the $2.7 billion countervailing (anti-subsidy) investigation on Chinese Oil Country Tubular Goods. The commissioners found the US domestic industry had been injured, with all six commissioners voting that injury had occurred as a result of the flood of imports of chinese subsidized steel tubes. (6-0)
As a result of this finding, the combined anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tariffs on OCTG (oil pipe) now will range from 10-99%, meaning these tariffs will be prohibitive to the high-cost Chinese steel pipe makers. The tariffs in this case are determined in order to offset damage caused by illegal subsidies and dumping.
This was, to our knowledge the largest steel related case handled by the ITC, and the unanimous decision will certainly add to the strains between mercantilist China and the United States.
More  Chinese Steel trade cases are, pardon the pun, “in the pipeline.”
Dow Jones Newswire Report.
Share

Breaking news. Bloomberg and other sources report that duties up to 31% will be imposed on Chinese produced OCTG (Oil Country Tubular Goods) on the basis of their production with the support of unfair government subsidizes. Average duties are expected to be about 21%, according to the Commerce Department preliminary report.

Like it or not 6.8 billion people live here. We need to trade fairly.
Like it or not 6.8 billion people live here. We need to trade fairly.

In my International Trade Class, we discuss the subject of mercantilism, which is the best way to describe China’s trade policy. When I was in college, the Chinese called the US “imperialists.” This  Department of Commerce finding supports the claim made by many laid off US manufacturing workers that today China, Inc.  is a “commercial imperialist.”
We believe that this case and the forthcoming Chinese tire case (see our blog story dated July 2) are bellwethers of the road ahead for trade relations between the US and China. Trade need not be a zero sum or negative sum game. But artificially manipulating a firms “comparative advantage” is not the way that trade can be sustained in the world today.
China produced 38% of world crude steel production in 2008 according to World Steel Association . With that much power must come discipline.
Harm to  the US manufacturing industry continues as a result of both the past and current adminstration’s  failure to act on China’s mercantilist trade practices and predatory pegged currency scheme. We  are glad to see  the Commerce Department is at least functioning and reviewing trade cases. 
Hey Washington, how about some change? 
How has the impact of Chinese currency manipulation or mercantilism/subsidies  impacted your company or your employment? Post your comment here.
photo credit : thechinabeat http://thechinabeat.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html
 
Share