Precision Plus, Inc. is featured in the latest issue of Wisconsin STEM Pathways Magazine.
The article, entitled Companies in the Classroom–Putting the Classroom in the Workplace, chronicles the company’s two year journey from a concept to the reality of having an internship and a apprenticeship program for high school and college students, as well as a fully equipped classroom within its facilities.
PMPA member companies recognize the challenge of finding a skilled workforce.
That’s why companies like Precision Plus, Inc. are actually doing something about it.
And why we are active working locally and nationally to make a difference and change the conversation about skills and careers and economic success.
Congratulations to Precision Plus, Inc., for leading the way to create the skilled workforce our industry needs.
To download a PDF of the complete article, click here. The Precision Plus Inc. Blog Precision Plus Website
Burrs and foreign object damage are consideration that are increasingly critical as precision machined parts are engineered from more challenging materials and to demanding geometries and applications.- Guest Post by John Halladay of Vectron, Inc. Burrs are unwanted raised material remaining on a machined part as a result of prior manufacturing operations. Link here
Foreign Object Damage (FOD):Any damage attributed to a foreign object that can be expressed in physical or economic terms which may or may not degrade the product’s required safety and/or performance characteristics.
“Cause damage, degrade product’s safety or performance characteristics, and economic damage” – These are serious issues to manufacturers and their customers making critical human safety reliant systems- like automotive, aerospace, fluid power, or medical devices or systems.
So how do we deal with Burrs, and FOD? John Halladay of Vectron explains:
“Based on my experience (a few more years than I care to admit) there are some things to consider with difficult to see FOD and burrs. Number one, hand deburring is typically out of the question—even with magnification. If hand deburring does happen to remove the burr, the dislodged burr magically transforms itself into yet another source of FOD. Mass finishing techniques (vibro, tumbling, Spinner, bead blast/water jet) will fall into the same trap. They may be able to dislodge the burr or foreign object, but then that dis lodged item creates damage to the surface finish or features you fought hard to create in the part.” “Thermal deburring is a batch process involving very intense heat in very short durations. It’s like being inside an explosion. Because it utilizes combustible gases under pressure, it has been proven to be extremely effective at removing the hard to see burrs we often encounter on the less machinable materials and alloys we see in our shops today. One advantage of Thermal Deburring is that it does not create FOD, and the process will seek out other sources of FOD that may be lurking in some of the tightest geometries in the part. There is nothing quite like an explosive gaseous mixture to see and vaporize and remove all unwanted debris on or in our parts! “Electro-Chemical Deburring, is usually referred to as ECD. It applies an electrical current to the areas where the burrs are located. The current carried by the electrolyte actually dissolves the burr material. This process can actually create a controlled radius on the workpiece by its action.”
Electro-Chemical deburring is therefore quite useful for removing burrs at internal intersections, especially when a radius is either desired or required. The downside of ECD is that it may not completely take care of other sources of FOD. This is easily resolved with the addition of a special wash process in conjunction with ECD to get to “Yes” with your customer.
Due to the expense and engineering associated with these processes, and the intermittent need for them, these processes are seldom performed in house in contract manufacturer’s operations. They are readily available from a number of job shops across the continent. You will find that most shops will provide a no-charge feasibility analysis including sample processing, so there’s really no down side to investigating these options while you continue to search for possible in-house solutions.
You wouldn’t use a gage that measures in 0.001″ increments for a requirement in 0.0001.” Why tolerate similar inaccuracies in your OSHA reporting work product?
Guest Post by James Pryor II, American Safety and Health Management Consultants, Inc. Here are 5 tips to help keep your OSHA 300 up to requirements:
Record ALL hours worked by ALL employeescovered by the records – Hourly , Salary, Part Time, and Temporary.
If necessary,estimate by multiplying the average number of workers by 2000 to obtain hours worked.
Verify hoursby confirming against what amount was paid to unemployment insurance.
If the hours you report are too low (underestimated) the incidence rate will be too high.
If the hours you report are too high (overestimated) the incidence rate will be too low.
Why is the incidence rate so important? It is the go / no go gage that will determine whether or not your shop safety program gets a pass or a closer look. The DayAway and Restricted Time Report is a listing that is closely examined by OSHA. Too high an Incidence Rate will indicate a need for a review. Too low an incidence rate could give a false picture of your safety performance and lead to unintended consequences.
We don’t really have the technology to do a long form Gage R&R on your safety paperwork, but following these 5 tips will assure that your program “meets print.” Use your passion for quality to assure high performance in all aspects of your shop’s safety program.The actionable information in your accurate OSHA 300 Log will help you continue to improve your shop’s safety performance.
Here is a link to our post on the 7 Indirect Costs of a Failed Safety Program.
Photo credit: Thanks Eighth Diary. Good luck with your work in the office!